Ethan Mollick argues we have moved beyond 'autocomplete for code' to fully autonomous agents that can build and deploy applications. A glimpse into the near future where legal drafting shifts from assistance to full-stack execution.
Harvey introduces persistent memory, allowing the system to learn preferences and context across different matters. This marks the shift from stateless chat to personalised, longitudinal legal assistants.
A brief look from Fred Wilson (AVC) at the 'Notebook Lawyer' concept - using tools like Google's NotebookLM to digest complex legal agreements. A signal that client-side AI tools are becoming powerful enough to challenge billable hours.
You no longer need to know syntax, just the requirements (the 'vibe'). As the barrier to building software collapses, we may see a wave of lawyers building their own bespoke internal tools rather than buying them.
A practical resource for 'Agent Skills' - standardised, portable instructions that teach AI agents how to perform specific legal tasks (e.g. GDPR reviews). A move towards shared standards for agentic workflows.
The blog introduction to the Pathways report. Frames the industry's transition into 'Horizon 2' - a messy middle ground where firms must pivot from labour-intensive production to tech-enabled scalable expertise.
State of Consumer AI 2025 (PDF)
A landscape report highlighting a 'winner-take-most' market (ChatGPT vs. Gemini) and the rise of 'viral creative tools'. Useful for lawyers to spot the upstream user behaviours that will eventually hit the enterprise.
Pathways: A Roadmap for Law Firms (PDF)
A strategic report by Harvey and The Legal Tech Fund. It argues value is shifting from 'time spent' to 'outcomes delivered' and offers a framework for firms to navigate the 'profitability paradox' of investing in AI while current profits remain high.
A massive crowdsourced list of predictions. The consensus? No AGI in 2026, but expect 'AI neutrals' for dispute resolution and specific court rules sanctioning lawyers who cite hallucinations.
MIT Technology Review - What is a "Parameter"
A clear, non-technical explainer from MIT Technology Review on the 'atoms' of Large Language Models. A good primer to send to colleagues who still treat AI as magic rather than math.
A strategic analysis identifying three specific gaps in the current market where legal tech founders (or intrapreneurs) could build valuable tools, rather than competing in crowded verticals.
Argues that we need to stop testing models in the abstract and start benchmarking the specific 'artifacts' (documents, answers) they produce. A mature take on how to actually measure quality.
Complements the 'Vibe Coding' piece above - suggests that as coding becomes easier, the most valuable legal tools will be built by practising lawyers solving their own niche problems, not by external software vendors.
How AI Destroys Institutions (PDF)
A critical academic paper arguing AI is anathema to institutions like the law because it erodes expertise, short-circuits accountability, and isolates humans. A necessary counter-narrative to the efficiency hype.